But here are the two I do have..... one taken by my mom, and one taken by Nic's best friend.
1 day old

5 days old (just in the last hour)
Thoughts on Life in the 'Hood

So I went in for my appointment, and she was talking about how I'm overdue now, and blah blah blah, and I'm going in for a non-stress test on Sunday at 2 to check amniotic fluid levels and make sure the baby's heartrate is ok. I really didn't want that done because I don't want ANYTHING done, but I was like whatever, I'll go with it. They said they'll check me for dilation, and then they'll check again next Friday (my next appointment), and if I'm not dilated and my cervix isn't soft, they can't induce me, I would have to have a C-section. They said they will wait as long as possible, but they really want me to have her by 42 weeks. So she said that they don't have to check me for dilation today, it's my choice, but it will give them an idea as to where I'm at and all that.
So I went ahead with it. I didn't want to be checked, but I figured I REALLY don't want to be induced, so I would rather do this and submit to a battery of tests and stuff than be induced. So she checks me, and I'm 3-4 cm dilated. Sweet! That means that if worst comes to worst, they can strip my membranes and/or break my water, and if absolutely necessary, induce me.
So then I said something about how I'm only a day overdue. So she gave me a funny look and said...... PLOT TWIST......
"No, you're actually 5 days overdue. You were due on the 11th."
OMG! NO WAY! I had no idea!
What happened was when I got pregnant, it was right after my miscarriage. I thought I ovulated on January 28, which put me at October 22 for a due date. So I went in for my first ultrasound, and for being so early, it was really clear and it was clearly a BABY, it didn't look like a blob like it normally does that early. And that ultrasound measured me farther along, and gave me a due date of October 11. The first ultrasound is always the most accurate, so later on, I brought it up with my doctor (who didn't even LOOK at it), and she was like "Ok, that's weird, but I guess we'll wait till your 20 week ultrasound and see what it says." Which is kind of dumb, because the 20 week ultrasound is always about a week off, but whatever. So the 20 week ultrasound put me at October 15. That's what she put on my record.
So at 26 weeks, I switched to my midwife. When I was giving her all this information, I told them about the due date crap, and I thought she would keep it at the 15th like my doctor did, but I learned today that they went by the first ultrasound instead of the 20 week one, since it's most accurate, so they've had me in the system as October 11, and I didn't even know!!
So on Sunday I'll be a week overdue. That blows my mind!!
But it was TOTALLY a God thing, because if I had known I was due on the 11th, we wouldn't have gone to our new town on the 12th (which is 3 hours from the hospital I'm delivering at), which means we wouldn't have picked the apartment we picked, I would've just had to flip a coin and pick one, or go with what Nic thought.... but I hated the one Nic thought I would like. So it was totally a God thing that I didn't know!
So now we wait. Hopefully not for long. I'm fine with being pregnant longer, but Nic is getting a little impatient!
As a VBAC patient, I hear from a lot of people (doctors, friends, family members, concerned grocery store clerks....) that there is a risk of uterine rupture. But I already know this.... I have done extensive research on the risks and benefits of both a VBAC and a repeat cesarean. Unfortunately, doctors tend to over-exaggerate the risk of uterine rupture in a VBAC. Here is an article on the reality of that risk.
Relative Risks of Uterine Rupture
Written by Eileen Sullivan, with assistance from her husband, Patrick.
After checking, it seems I was a bit off on the frequency of deadly lightning strikes... you are more likely to suffer a rupture than to be struck and killed by lightning, by about thirty times. Then again, how many people do you know who HAVE been struck and killed by lightning?
Ruptures are also more common than dying in a plane crash. Henci Goer's review of the literature on VBACs found 46 ruptures in 15,154 labors. This equates to a 0.3% rate... or 1 in 333, if you prefer. Your annual risk of dying in a plane crash is 1 in 4000, according to one source, and 1 in 700,000 according to another. I can't explain the massive discrepancy between the two figures, except to quote Mark Twain about "lies, damn lies, and statistics."
Since you asked, here are some more probability statistics for you:
Your risk of dying in a car accident, over the course of your lifetime, is between 1 in 42 and 1 in 75. This is roughly 4 to 5 times greater than the risk of uterine rupture.
You're about twice as likely to have your car stolen (that's an annual risk) than to experience a uterine rupture.
Your odds of being murdered are 1 in 140 over the course of your lifetime. That's 2 times more likely than the risk of rupture.
The annual risk of having a heart attack is 1 in 160, 2 times more likely than rupture. Your risk of dying from heart disease is roughly 1 in 6, or 55 times greater than your risk of rupture.
If you're a smoker, your risk of dying from lung cancer is 1 and a half times more likely than a VBAC mom rupturing during her labor.
You're about 17 times more likely to contract an STD this year than you are to have a uterine rupture; more likely to contract gonorrhea than to rupture, as well.
You're 13 times more likely to get food poisoning than to rupture.
You're more likely to have twins than a uterine rupture. Odds of twins: 1 in 90. That's about 3 1/2 times the likelihood of rupture.
If you ride horseback, you're 3 times more likely to die in a riding accident than you are to experience a uterine rupture.
If you ride a bike on the street, you are 4 times more likely to die in an accident (annual risk) than you are to suffer a rupture.
Having a serious fire in your home during the next year is twice as likely as experiencing a rupture.
You're ten times as likely to win at roulette as you are to have a uterine rupture.
If you flip a coin, you'll be more likely to get heads (or tails) 8 times in a row than to rupture.
The risk of cord prolapse is 1 in 37 (2.7%), or nearly ten times more likely than that of rupture.
And a final irony (heads up, those of you who want a doc to give his/her opinion on your likelihood of rupture next pregnancy!)...
You're 6 times more likely to have a doctor who is an impostor than you are to suffer a rupture. Two percent of docs are phonies (1 in 50), according to several sources I found.
So instead of worrying about rupture, why not take a few minutes to check up on your doctor's credentials? ;) It'd be a more profitable use of your time, and a substantially more likely cause for alarm.